Also, Nobel Prize winner, Dr. Otto Warburg’s research revealed:
1) Healthy cells have TMP voltages from 70-90 millivolts (mV) or higher. At this voltage, cells are completely charged and the body has ample energy and health.
2) Stress of life, poor diet, impure water and air, lack of sleep, emotional problems, poor environment, etc., cause the cell voltage to drop. If the voltage drops below 50 millivolts (mV), a person starts to feel ill (may experience chronic fatigue and other disease symptoms)
3) If the voltage drops to 15 millivolts (mV) or lower, it is usually because the cell is cancerous.
Within the cell membrane the sodium-potassium pump forces a ratio of 3 sodium ions out of the cell for every 2 potassium ions in, for proper metabolism and cellular functioning. This is the pump that drives the absorption and assimilation of essential nutrients and also the removal of metabolic waste products and other unwanted compounds (heavy metals, chemicals, free radicals, etc.).
This pump also assists in maintaining a healthy cellular voltage or TMP. Because 3 sodium ions are pumped out versus 2 potassium pumped in, there is a net positive charge on the outside of the cell creating a voltage across the cell membrane that can store energy. An impaired sodium-potassium pump results in edema and a tendency towards fermentation (anaerobic respiration) as well as diminished ATP production. Studies have shown when sodium potassium exchange is restored, pain reduction, increased wound healing, and bones heal faster as a result3
An alkaline environment has a surplus of electrons. An acidic environment has a lack of electrons. All diseases occur from an acidic environment, so disease occurs when your voltage is low
When using the anaerobic pathway, only 2 molecules of ATP are produced with lactic acid as a byproduct. That’s a big double whammy. Less energy and a more acidic body! !The two always go hand in hand. It’s not possible to have highly energized cells and an acidic body. Again, that’s because pH is indirectly a measurement of voltage. Cellular voltage and pH are married in either sickness or in health. And oxygen is a vital key to shifting gears to more energy and voltage because when oxygen is present in healthy amounts in the mitochondria, your cells produce ATP via aerobic respiration.
As we have mentioned, aerobic respiration yields 38 molecules of ATP versus only 2 for anaerobic PLUS aerobic respiration has no acidifying lactic acid. !e only by-products of aerobic respiration are water and carbon dioxide. Also, maintaining a healthy TMP (trans-membrane potential) is key to allowing oxygen to be delivered into the cells. Another important point is that water itself dissolves and holds more oxygen when it’s at a higher voltage. When oxygen drops the cells are forced to anaerobic respiration which yields only 2 ATP compared to 38 ATP. Your 100 trillion cells struggle with so little energy, manifesting infection, waste buildup, toxicity, sickness and disease. Most bacteria and parasites are anaerobic, hating oxygen. So low oxygen allows bugs to wake up and begin feeding on us. Remember the terrain is key. Having an optimal level of oxygen is one of the most important components for a healthy terrain, a healthy body and a strong and healthy bio-energy field.
Cellular voltage and pH are married in either sickness or in health.
with oxygen – byproducs are water, and co2.
Without oxygen, byproducts are lactic acid
Here is the kicker, if you are lacking suffcient oxygen, your cells will revert to what is called the fermentation cycle, lactic acid cycle or anaerobic respiration cycle (all three are synonymous). This means ATP is created without oxygen with lactic acid as a by-product. This is why you get cramps in marathons and endurance events and why you can proverbially “hit the wall” at a certain point, because your body is not delivering oxygen fast enough to the mitochondria to make ATP.
cancel is a cellular voltage problem, that complicates over time
you do not have enough oxygen, you go from Arobic respiration – making 38 ATP per unit of glucose. If you are oxygen deficient, you make 2 ATP per unit of glucose.
According to this report, and unbeknownst to the masses of the American people, Hillary Clinton, her Democrat Party, and the shadow government “Deep State”, all comprise what can only be described as one of history’s largest criminal organizations, but whose very existence was threatened by the election of President Trump—thus necessitating these criminals’ need to throw their entire nation into sustained political chaos in order to protect themselves as they believe they can claim Trump is persecuting them for their political beliefs when he begins arresting them—and when that happens, are relying on masses of leftist mobs to descend upon American cities to demand their freedom, and is exactly what they’re practicing for today with the Kavanaugh Charade.
One such example of the wholesale corruption of this Clinton-Democrat-Deep State criminal syndicate, this report explains, was put forth this past January to Russia’s top three intelligence agency chiefs, during their historic visit to Washington D.C. to meet with Trump’s top intelligence organizations—and where the Americans detailed their full knowledge of how Russian Deputy Attorney General Karapetyan directed hundreds-of-millions of dollars to then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that enabled Russia to purchase US uranium reserves—and is known as the Uranium One Scandal.
On 14 July, this report further notes, Deputy Attorney General Karapetyan “retreated” to his summer dacha in the village of Vonyshevo outside of Moscow—where new FSB reports from obtained after his believed to be assassination describe that his “patterns and practices” were not considered by his associates to be “of normal occurrence”—with it further being described to FSB agents that Karapetyan had become “mentally agitated” after his discovering that President Trump had penetrated Hillary Clinton’s law firm Perkins Coie to learn their secrets—and two of whose founding partners Trump appointed to be US federal judges in exchange for the information they had given him.
Most stunning (at least to us) about this SVR report is its ending with a reference directing the reader to the appendix of Deputy Attorney General Karapetyan’s foreign travels—most particularly his August-2016 visit to London where he met with FBI Counterterrorism Chief Peter Strzok who was visiting there too—and in whose notes Karapetyan related how Strzok was concerned that his “implants” weren’t taking and were causing him to continue failing his FBIpolygraph exams.
The idea that it is a good thing to confront, intimidate, and even rough up people with whom you disagree to advance a political agenda dates back to community organizer and former President Barack Obama but is reaching new levels of hostility since the election of President Donald Trump.
“I need you to go out and talk to your friends and talk to your neighbors,” Obama said on the presidential campaign trail in September 2008. “I want you to talk to them whether they are independent or whether they are Republican.”
“I want you to argue with them and get in their face,” Obama said.
Fast forward to 2018 when lawmakers and activists are encouraging confrontations with members of Congress who disagree with them or support Trump.
“If you think a few women were getting up in their faces at an airport, if they thought of us calmly saying, ‘Listen to survivors’ was enough to shake and intimidate them, well, wait till they go home,” Epps-Addison said. “Wait till they go to the state fair. Wait till they go to the coffee shop. Wait till they go to the movies. Wait till they go anywhere we see them.”
“Make your voice heard,” Epps-Addison said. “Do not be calm. Do not be silenced. Do not be patient.”
Leftists continue to get marching orders from elected officials, including Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA).
In June, Waters told her supporters at a rally in Los Angeles to “push back.”
”Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up,” Waters said. “And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd.”
“And you push back on them,” Water said. “And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”
Booker gave similar advice in July at theNational Conference on Ending Homelessness.
“Please don’t just come here today and then go home,” Booker said. ”Go to the Hill today. Get up and, please, get up in the face of some congresspeople.”
Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-KY) wife, Kelley, recently wrote an open letter to Booker expressing her anguish over the harm done to her husband after a neighbor attacked him. She shared other “horrifying” threats the family has faced and called on Booker to condemn the ongoing threats and violence.
The same angry anti-Kavanaugh protesters confronted Sen. David Perdue (R-GA) recently at an airport.
And in June, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders and her guests were thrown out of a restaurant in rural Virginia after the owner refused to serve them because of Sanders’ service in the Trump administration.
Melania Trump on #MeToo: Women Need to Be Heard, but ‘Show the Evidence’
First Lady Melania Trump believes the #MeToo movement is important, but women and men should also have hard evidence when making allegations of sexual assault.
“I support the women, and they need to be heard. We need to support them. And also men, not just women,” the first lady said. “You need to have a really hard evidence that if you are accused of something, show the evidence.”
Trump defended her position, noting that sometimes the media went too far with coverage of #MeToo stories
“You cannot just say to somebody, I was sexually assaulted or you did that to me … sometimes the media goes too far, the way they portray some stories, it’s not correct, it’s not right,” she said.
WATCH: One-on-one with First Lady @MelaniaTrump. She’s opening up for the first time about her life and her time in the White House to @TomLlamasABC.
Trump commented on the movement during a sit-down interview with ABC News reporter Tom Llama, who traveled with the first lady to Africa. The first portion of the interview was aired on Good Morning America on Wednesday morning.
Llama boasted Wednesday that “no question was off the table” in the interview, including a question about President Donald Trump’s infidelity.
“You’re not the first first lady to have to deal with your husband’s infidelities, has this put a strain on your marriage?” he asks, in a promotion clip of the interview.
“If you say anything that someone doesn’t like, you are ultimately a target,” truck owner Johnny MacKay told Portland’s KOIN-TV. “You’re automatically the enemy, and they have to hurt you.”
The Vancouver, Washington, resident found his vehicle set on fire outside the Garage Bar and Grille after he had left the truck in the bar’s parking lot the night before.
MacKay told the media he felt overserved the night before and had taken an Uber home, but when he returned the next day to retrieve his vehicle, he found it destroyed.
“All of a sudden I saw the tires were melted, the windows were shattered, and I was just in shock,” MacKay told the media.
Not only was his truck burned to ruination, but it was also spray-painted with anti-Trump slogans. The truck owner said he did not vote for Trump in 2016 but does support him now that he is in office.
“I literally just put them on this weekend,” he said of the bumper stickers. “If I would’ve known somebody would’ve taken politics this far — I saw them, I thought they were funny and apparently somebody didn’t get the joke.”
A local resident heard the ruckus when the firebomb went off. “All of a sudden I hear a loud bomb and the windows shake,” Randy Sanchagrin said:
Check this video out! A Vancouver man believes his car was set on fire because if his @realDonaldTrump bumper stickers: “If you say anything that someone doesn’t like you are ultimately a target. You’re automatically the enemy and they have to hurt you.” #KOIN6Newspic.twitter.com/gIa24VyDzp
An internal company briefing produced by Google and leaked exclusively to Breitbart News argues that due to a variety of factors, including the election of President Trump, the “American tradition” of free speech on the internet is no longer viable.
Despite leaked video footage showing top executives declaring their intention to ensure that the rise of Trump and the populist movement is just a “blip” in history, Google has repeatedly denied that the political bias of its employees filter into its products.
But the 85-page briefing, titled “The Good Censor,” admits that Google and other tech platforms now “control the majority of online conversations” and have undertaken a “shift towards censorship” in response to unwelcome political events around the world.
Examples cited in the document include the 2016 election and the rise of Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) in Germany.
Responding to the leak, an official Google source said the document should be considered internal research, and not an official company position.
The briefing labels the ideal of unfettered free speech on the internet a “utopian narrative” that has been “undermined” by recent global events as well as “bad behavior” on the part of users. It can be read in full below.
It acknowledges that major tech platforms, including Google, Facebook and Twitter initially promised free speech to consumers. “This free speech ideal was instilled in the DNA of the Silicon Valley startups that now control the majority of our online conversations,” says the document.
The briefing argues that Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter are caught between two incompatible positions, the “unmediated marketplace of ideas” vs. “well-ordered spaces for safety and civility.”
The first approach is described as a product of the “American tradition” which “prioritizes free speech for democracy, not civility.” The second is described as a product of the “European tradition,” which “favors dignity over liberty and civility over freedom.” The briefing claims that all tech platforms are now moving toward the European tradition.
The briefing associates Google’s new role as the guarantor of “civility” with the categories of “editor” and “publisher.” This is significant, given that Google, YouTube, and other tech giants publicly claim they are not publishers but rather neutral platforms — a categorization that grants them special legal immunities under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Elsewhere in the document, Google admits that Section 230 was designed to ensure they can remain neutral platforms for free expression.
Trump, Conspiracy Theorist
One of the reasons Google identifies for allegedly widespread public disillusionment with internet free speech is that it “breeds conspiracy theories.” The example Google uses? A 2016 tweet from then-candidate Donald Trump, alleging that Google search suppressed negative results about Hillary Clinton.
At the time, Google said that it suppressed negative autocomplete suggestions about everybody, not just Clinton. But it was comparatively easy to find such autocomplete results when searching for Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump. Independent research from psychologist Dr. Robert Epstein also shows that Google search results (if not autocomplete results) did indeed favor Clinton in 2016.
Twice in the document, Google juxtaposes a factoid about “Russian interference” in American elections with pictures of Donald Trump. At one point, the document admits that tech platforms are changing their policies to pre-empt congressional action on foreign interference.
The document did not address the fact that, according to leading psychologists, the impact of foreign “bots” and propaganda on social media has a negligible impact on voters.
From Suggestions to Company Policy
It is unclear for whom the “Good Censor” was intended. What is clear, however, is that Google spent (or paid someone to spend) significant time and effort to produce it.
According to the briefing itself, it was the product of an extensive process involving “several layers of research,” including expert interviews with MIT Tech Review editor-in-chief Jason Pontin, Atlantic staff writer Franklin Foer, and academic Kalev Leetaru. 35 cultural observers and 7 cultural leaders from seven countries on five continents were also consulted to produce it.
What is also clear is that many of the briefing’s recommendations are now reflected in the policy of Google and its sibling companies.
For example, the briefing argues that tech companies will have to censor their platforms if they want to “expand globally.” Google is now constructing a censored search engine to gain access to the Chinese market.
The document also bemoans that the internet allows “have a go commenters” (in other words, ordinary people) to compete on a level playing field with “authoritative sources” like the New York Times. Google-owned YouTube now promotes so-called “authoritative sources” in its algorithm. The company did not specifically name which sources it would promote.
Key points in the briefing can be found at the following page numbers:
P2 – The briefing states that “users are asking if the openness of the internet should be celebrated after all” and that “free speech has become a social, economic, and political weapon.”
P11 – The briefing identifies Breitbart News as the media publication most interested in the topic of free speech.
P12 – The briefing says the early free-speech ideals of the internet were “utopian.”
P14 – The briefing admits that Google, along with Twitter and Facebook, now “control the majority of online conversations.”
P15 – Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is linked to Google’s position as a platform for free expression. Elsewhere in the document (p68), Google and other platforms’ move towards moderation and censorship is associated with the role of “publisher” – which would not be subject to Section 230’s legal protections.
PP19-21 – The briefing identifies several factors that allegedly eroded faith in free speech. The election of Donald Trump and alleged Russian involvement is identified as one such factor. The rise of the populist Alternative fur Deutschland (Alternative for Germany) party in Germany – which the briefing falsely smears as “alt-right” – is another.
PP26-34 – The briefing explains how “users behaving badly” undermines free speech on the internet and allows “crummy politicians to expand their influence.” The briefing bemoans that “racists, misogynists, and oppressors” are allowed a voice alongside “revolutionaries, whistleblowers, and campaigners.” It warns that users are “keener to transgress moral norms” behind the protection of anonymity.
P37 – The briefing acknowledges that China – for which Google has developed a censored search engine – has the worst track record on internet freedom.
P45 – After warning about the rise of online hate speech, the briefing approvingly cites Sarah Jeong, infamous for her hate speech against white males (Google is currently facing a lawsuit alleging it discriminates against white males, among other categories).
P45 – The briefing bemoans the fact that the internet has until recently been a level playing field, warning that “rational debate is damaged when authoritative voices and ‘have a go’ commentators receive equal weighting.”
P49 – The document accuses President Trump of spreading the “conspiracy theory” that Google autocomplete suggestions unfairly favored Hillary Clinton in 2016. (Trump’s suspicions were actually correct – independent research has shown that Google did favor Clinton in 2016).
P53 – Free speech platform Gab is identified as a major destination for users who are dissatisfied with censorship on other platforms.
P54 – After warning about “harassment” earlier in the document, the briefing approvingly describes a 27,000-strong left-wing social media campaign as a “digital flash mob” engaged in “friendly counter-commenting.”
P57 – The document juxtaposes a factoid about Russian election interference with a picture of Donald Trump.
P63 – The briefing admits that when Google, GoDaddy and CloudFlare simultaneously withdrew service from website The Daily Stormer, they were “effectively booting it off the internet,” a point also made by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the FCC in their subsequent warnings about online censorship.
P66-68 – The briefing argues that Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter are caught between two incompatible positions, the “unmediated marketplace of ideas” vs. “well-ordered spaces for safety and civility.” The first is described as a product of the “American tradition” which “prioritizes free speech for democracy, not civility.” The second is described as a product of the “European tradition,” which “favors dignity over liberty and civility over freedom.” The briefing claims that all tech platforms are now moving toward the European tradition.
P70 – The briefing sums up the reasons for big tech’s “shift towards censorship,” including the need to respond to regulatory demands and “expand globally,” to “monetize content through its organization,” and to “protect advertisers from controversial content, [and] increase revenues.”
P74-76 – The briefing warns that concerns about censorship from major tech platforms have spread beyond the right-wing media into the mainstream.
Liberal Billionaires Giving Hundreds of Millions to Help Democrats Beat Pro-Gun Republicans
Liberal billionaires like Michael Bloomberg, Tom Steyer, and others, are donating hundred of millions of dollars in hopes of helping Democrats beat pro-gun Republicans in the coming mid-term elections.
On September 28, 2018, Breitbart News reported that Bloomberg added $20 million to his original pledge of $80 million, thereby dedicating $100 million to flipping enough seats for a pro-gun control Congress.
Fox News reports that Steyer is ready to go stride-for-stride with Bloomberg. Steyer has already spent $41 million and prepared to spend a total of more than $110 million to see Congress flipped.
Like Bloomberg, Steyer has been working at flipping Congress for some time. On March 13, 2018, Florida Public Radio reported that Steyer had begun pouring millions in Florida races for the purposes of registering young voters who “will help elect pro-gun control politicians in the midterm elections.”
Steyer is also open about his goal of impeaching President Trump.
Democrats are also receiving help from billionaire Donald Sussman, James Simons, and Reid Hoffman.
Hoffman donates less money than the other billionaires–giving millions instead of hundreds of millions–but he gets the most out of every dollar by using his donations in very specific ways. Those ways include purchasing unorthodox political ads to appeal to millennials and non-traditional voters.
Nolte: CNN Says Mobs Have ‘Constitutional Right’ To Chase Republicans Out of Restaurants
The far-left CNN spent much of Tuesday defending mob action against Republicans as a “Constitutional right” and as fearless acts of free speech.
On her low-rated afternoon show, CNN’s Brooke Baldwin mocked both of her guests as they described the left-wing activists who chased Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and his wife out of a DC restaurant last month as a “mob.”
“Oh, you’re not going to use the mob word here,” Baldwin moaned after the Daily Caller’s Matt Lewis brought up the mob that harassed Cruz and his wife.
“A mob is what we saw in Charlottesville, Virginia, two Augusts ago. A mob is not what we saw chasing — I’m not saying what they did was right.” Baldwin argued.
When asked what she would call the people banging on the Supreme Court walls, Baldwin refused to answer. She just mocked her guests by shaking her head and covering her eyes before moving on to another subject.
Get ready to roll your eyes…
CNN’s Brooke Baldwin is offended that the left’s angry mob was called… a mob.
Later, during his last-place evening show, far-left activist Don Lemon went even further in defending mob action against the political right by framing it as free speech.
Again the guest was Lewis and again the example was of Cruz and his wife being intimidated out of a restaurant.
“Don, if they started following you around a restaurant and running you out of places,” Lewis said.
Lemon interrupted, “But that doesn’t mean that people don’t get to object. That’s your right as an American to object. It’s covered in the First Amendment. It’s like the first one!”
After Lewis continued to press his case that there is a difference between free speech and harassing a man and his wife until you are able to bully them into fleeing a public restaurant, Lemon started screaming at Lewis.
Will you let me finish? Matt, please! Let me finish,” Lemon shouted.
“Bring it on. Mind if I have a drink?” Lewis asked.
“You can do whatever you want. You can leave the show if you want,” Lemon fired back.
“I’m not going to do that,” Lewis said.
“Shut up and let me do it,” Lemon snarled.
With the floor to himself, Lemon launched into a full-throated defense of mob action:
“In the Constitution, you can protest whenever and wherever you want. It doesn’t tell you that you can’t do it in a restaurant, that you can’t do it on a football field. It doesn’t tell you that you can’t do it on a cable news — you can do it wherever you want.”
“To call people mobs because they are exercising their constitutional right is just beyond the pale,” Lemon said before cutting to a commercial.
This was not the first time Lemon has defended mobs harassing Cruz and his wife.
CNN’s history of dismissing, inciting, downplaying, or outright advocating in favor of political violence against Republicans and conservatives is a long and sordid one.
The anti-Trump outlet has openly called for race riots, frequently defends and even championing the left-wing terror group Antifa… And here is a list of more examples, though far from an exhaustive one:
To turn the Trayvon Martin story into a black vs. white narrative, CNN falsely identified George Zimmerman (the man who shot and killed Martin in self-defense) as white. Zimmerman is Hispanic.
CNN fabricated evidence against Zimmerman with the false claim he used a racial slur while calling 9-1-1.
CNN’s Jake Tapper stood in the middle of the Ferguson, Missouri, tinderbox and poured gasoline all over it with a hysterical anti-police rant.
Just after the riots in Ferguson finally ceased, to gin things back up, CNN released unverified audio of what they claimed was the shooting of Michael Brown. The audio has still not been verified and there is one gunshot missing.
Hillary Says Misconduct Allegations Against Bill Different from Kavanaugh
Hillary Clinton told the far-left CNN that the sexual misconduct allegations against her husband were different than those against Brett Kavanaugh.
The interview was conducted by the left-wing Christiane Amanpour. It was made up of 30 minutes of softballs that allowed Hillary to tee off on whatever she wanted (primarily President Trump) without any tough follow ups.
The most outrageous moment, however, came at the end when Amanpour spread some breathtaking fake news. In reference to the Clintons upcoming speaking tour, Amanpour asked:
Obviously you’re going to be prepared to have questions about that moment in 1998, the impeachment, the allegations of sexual harassment against your own husband. Are you prepared to answer those questions? Is he prepared to answer them? And how do you see that similar or different from what President Trump is being accused of and Kavanaugh and others today?
Before we get to Hillary’s answer, let’s look at the question… Amanpour describing the allegations against Bill Clinton as “harassment” is like describing an apple as, say, a banana, an uzi as a Dreamsicle, CNN as a legitimate news outlet.
Bill Clinton was not accused of harassment. Among other things, he was credibly accused of rape (Juanita Broaddrick), of exposing himself (Paula Jones), and of groping a grieving widow in the Oval Office (Kathleen Willey).
What’s more, over the exposure allegation, Clinton was forced to settle a lawsuit filed with Paula Jones for $850,000, which was $100,000 more than Jones originally asked for.
Here’s Hillary’s answer:
There’s a very significant difference. And that is the intense, long-lasting partisan investigation that was conducted in the ’90s. If, you know, the Republicans, starting with President Trump on down, want a comparison, they should welcome such an investigation themselves.
The “partisan investigation” Hillary is obviously referring to is Independent Counsel Ken Starr, who was appointed, not by Republicans, but by three judges on the DC Circuit. What’s more, he was appointed to replace a man appointed by Clinton’s own attorney general, Janet Reno, who launched the special prosecutor … at the request of President Clinton himself.
And it was Clinton’s sleazy Oval office affair with Monica Lewinsky, a much young subordinate, along with the Jones’ suit, and his own act of perjury, that brought his sex life into the Starr investigation.
Apparently, Hillary would also like us to believe the now-debunked allegations against Kavanaugh were not partisan, when that is all they were. Accuser Christina Blasey Fordsurrounded herself with left-wing, activist lawyers. Donna Ramirez is herself a left-wing activist. Julie Swetnick is the creation of Michael Avenatti, a deeply partisan attorney determined to destroy Trump’s presidency.
Kavanaugh not only survived a deeply partisan three week investigation conducted by the establishment media, the Senate Judiciary Committee, and the FBI — he walked out of it exonerated.
On the other hand, Bill Clinton settled the indecent exposure case, was caught lying about Lewinsky, committed perjury, and Broaddrick’s rape allegation is about as credible as they come, including contemporaneous witnesses.
And what was Amanpour’s follow up question after Hillary spewed that nonsense?
Hillary Clinton, thank you very much indeed for joining me.
This is CNN.
Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC. Follow his Facebook Page here.
Michael Avenatti Vows to Sue Man Who Said Julie Swetnick Isn’t Credible
Television lawyer and 2020 Democrat hopeful Michael Avenatti says he is weighing civil and criminal legal action for his client Julie Setnick leveled against Supreme Court Brett Kavanaugh, even as it appears the Senate will confirm him Saturday.
In a brief interview with The Washington Post‘s Aaron Blake, Avenatti vowed to file a defamation lawsuit against Dennis Ketterer — a self-described former boyfriend of Swetnick who, in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee, raised doubts over her allegations. Asked why he chose to publicize Swetnick’s claims before the committee could fully vet them, Avenatti scoffed, “Why in God’s name would I have gone through the media? The media does not determine the veracity of facts and evidence.”
According to Ketterer, Swetnick said she liked group sex, and he said her father told him she “had psychological and other problems.”
During a conversation about our sexual preferences, things got derailed when Julie told me that she liked to have sex with more than one guy at a time. In fact sometimes with several at one time. She wanted to know if that would be ok in our relationship.
I asked her if this was just a fantasy of hers. She responded that she first tried sex with multiple guys while in high school and still liked it from time-to-time. She brought it up because she wanted to know if I would be interested in that.
A.I.D.S. was a huge issue at the time. And I had children. Due to her having a directly stated penchant for group sex, I decided not to see her anymore. It put my head back on straight. That was the last conversation we had.
Julie never said anything about being sexually assaulted, raped, gang-raped or having sex against her will. She never mentioned Brett Kavanaugh in any capacity.
Responding to the letter, Avenatti called Ketterer’s claims nothing more than “garbage” and sign of desperation from the Republicans. “The allegations he makes are false and without any basis,” he tweeted. “We demand that the FBI interview my client & him, and that anyone found to have submitted false info be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”
In a sworn statement, Swetnick alleged she attended house parties in Maryland during the 1980s, attended by Kavanaugh and friend Mark Judge. According to Swetnick, she claims to have become aware of instances in which Kavanaugh spiked punch bowls and alcohol and quaaludes for the purpose of targeting inebriated women. Swetnick claims she was gang-raped at a gathering where Kavanaugh and Judge were present.
MSNBC aired a 10-minute story Monday about reporter Kate Snow’s interview with Julie Swetnick, with an excerpt on NBC’s Nightly News. The interview was a continued topic of conversation — and further reporting — in the following days. In her story, Snow pointed out differences between what Swetnick told her and the affidavit released earlier by her lawyer, Michael Avenatti. For instance, Swetnick in her previous statement had accused Kavanaugh and his friends of “spiking” the punch at parties with drugs or grain alcohol so girls would lose their inhibitions. In the interview, Swetnick said she saw Kavanaugh standing near the punch but didn’t see him or friend Mark Judge spike it.
Swetnick also walked back allegations that Kavanaugh and other boys at the party waited their turn to “gang rape” girls who had been drugged. She told Snow she had no specific knowledge that this was happening. She did say that she was “violated” by boys at one party but couldn’t say whether Kavanaugh was involved. She said she contacted the Montgomery County, Maryland, police about it; when NBC contacted the police to ask if there were any records, they said it could take up to a month to find them.
The morning after the interview, Snow said Swetnick provided the names of four people she said she went to some of these parties with. One of these friends is dead, and one said he does not recall a Julie Swetnick. Two others had not returned NBC’s inquiries before the story aired and still had not on Tuesday, the network said.
Hours after it aired, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told Fox News Channel’s Sean Hannity that NBC was a “co-conspirator” in Kavanaugh’s destruction. He said NBC News would never have done the story if the nominee were a Democrat.
“Their journalistic integrity has been destroyed over this case,” Graham said.
As previously reported, Swetnick has an extensive history of involvement in legal disputes, including a lawsuit in which an ex-employer accused her of falsifying her college and work history on her job application. Legal documents from Maryland, Oregon, and Florida provide a partial picture of a woman who stepped into the media glare amid the battle over Kavanaugh’s nomination for the nation’s highest court.
Further, court records show Swetnick has been involved in at least six legal cases over the past 25 years. Along with the lawsuit filed by a former employer in November 2000, the cases include a personal injury suit she filed in 1994 against the Washington, D.C., regional transit authority.
Despite her past legal troubles, Avenatti claimed he “fully vetted” Swetnick before helping her take her claims against Kavanaugh public.
Avenatti released a sworn statement by Swetnick in which she says she witnessed Kavanaugh “consistently engage in excessive drinking and inappropriate contact of a sexual nature with women in the early 1980s.” In the statement provided to the committee, Swetnick alleged she had been sexually assaulted at a party attended by members of Kavanaugh’s social circle, but did not accuse him of assaulting her.
Swetnick was the third named Kavanaugh accuser to emerge when Avenatti released details of her accusations on Twitter on the eve of Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony.
Kavanaugh denied the claims made by Swetnick and other women, characterizing the allegations as a “joke” and a “farce.”
Swetnick, who is from the Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C., has claimed she is willing to be interviewed by either Congress or the FBI.
Some details of the legal disputes she’s been involved in aren’t known, because documents in the cases are incomplete or no longer available. Records in the lawsuit filed in late 2000 by her ex-employer, Oregon-based software company Webtrends, don’t indicate why it was dismissed. Avenatti said there was a settlement in the case but no money changed hands.
In its civil complaint in a state court in Oregon, the company said Swetnick, a software engineer, was an employee for a few weeks before its human resources department received a report that she had engaged in “unwelcome sexual innuendo and inappropriate conduct” toward two male co-workers at a business lunch.
The lawsuit said that Swetnick in turn accused Webtrends of subjecting her to “physically and emotionally threatening and hostile conditions” and that she claimed that she’d been sexually harassed by four co-workers. The co-workers denied the allegations, the suit said.
Company officials later determined, the suit said, that Swetnick had provided false information on her employment application. The suit alleged that she had misrepresented the length of time she worked at a previous employer and falsely claimed that she’d earned an undergraduate degree in biology and chemistry from Johns Hopkins University.
Swetnick was on the other side of a civil case in 1994, as a plaintiff, when she filed a personal injury lawsuit in Maryland against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. She claimed she lost more than $420,000 in earnings after she hurt her nose in a fall on a train in 1992.
Swetnick, who described herself in court records as a model and actor, claimed she had “numerous modeling commitments” with several companies at the time of the accident but missed out them because of her injuries.
To support her claim for lost wages, Swetnick named “Konam Studios” as one of the companies promising to employ her. A court filing identified Nam Ko, a representative of “Kunam Studios,” as a possible plaintiff’s witness for her case.
However, Ko said he was just a friend of Swetnick’s and that he had never owned a company with a name spelled either way and had never agreed to pay her money for any work before she injured her nose. He said he first met Swetnick at a bar more than a year after her alleged accident.
“I didn’t have any money back then. I (was) broke as can be,” Ko said.
Ko said he has a hazy memory of Swetnick asking to use him as a “character reference” but doesn’t recall hearing about her lawsuit. “I thought it was for a job application,” he said.
The paperwork filed in the suit includes a letter addressed to Swetnick’s attorney from Richard Zamora, who is identified as a marketing executive from a San Jose, California-based company called Fiber Sign Inc. In the letter, dated March 1994, Zamora said the company had been prepared to hire Swetnick as a model and spokeswoman and pay her a $60,000 base salary but offered the job to someone else after learning of her accident.
Zamora later asked a court in Florida for a restraining order against Swetnick. The remaining court records don’t show the reasons he gave for asking for the restraining order, but indicate that the case was dropped less than two weeks later when neither party appeared in court.
Avenatti said the request for a restraining order was “nonsense.”
Court records show Swetnick’s lawsuit against the transit agency was dismissed in 1997 after a settlement was reached. Vincent Jankoski, one of the lawyers who defended the agency, said the case was resolved without paying Swetnick any money after she failed to provide documentation supporting her lost-wage claims.
While “Mean Girls Day” is being marked Wednesday in reference to a mention of Oct. 3 in the popular 2004 cult movie, the parents of a former Seneca Valley High School student claim in a federal lawsuit filed this week that their teenage son was terrorized by false accusations made by five “mean girls” at the school.
Michael J. and Alecia Flood of Zelienople, Butler County, the parents of a teenage boy identified in the lawsuit as T.F., seek unspecified civil damages against the girls’ parents, the school district and Butler County District Attorney Richard Goldinger’s office. The lawsuit, which includes the term “mean girls,” alleges they “conspired in person and via electronic communication devices to falsely accuse T.F. of sexual assault on two occasions.”
Neither Goldinger nor Seneca Valley school officials returned calls seeking comment.
The 26-page lawsuit — filed in Pittsburgh on the eve of Mean Girls Day — alleges that T.F. “was forced to endure multiple court appearances, detention in a juvenile facility, detention at home, the loss of his liberty and other damages until several of the girls reluctantly admitted that their accusations were false” this summer.
The lawsuit contends T.F. was bullied on multiple occasions by classmates. In one example, the lawsuit said students last year placed masking tape with the word “PREDATOR” written on it on his back without his knowledge during choir practice.
The lawsuit alleges the boy was further damaged from “gender bias” by school officials and Goldinger’s office, which even after learning the girls’ accusations were false “did not take any action against the females involved,” said attorney Craig Fishman of Pittsburgh, who represents the Floods.
“(T.F.) was basically being tortured in school by the other students and investigators, but the administration was only focused on protecting the girls who were lying,” Fishman said. “Once the allegations were proven false, they really didn’t care one bit about T.F. and there has been absolutely no repercussions against the girls.”
The teen boy is being home-schooled, Fishman said.
According to the lawsuit, the first allegation occurred in July 2017 at an area swimming pool where T.F. worked as a lifeguard with then Seneca Valley High School graduate Megan Villegas, who is the only teenage defendant named in the lawsuit. The others are minors and are referred to only by initials, Fishman said.
Villegas could not be reached for comment.
The lawsuit contends T.F. was charged with sexually assaulting a girl identified in the lawsuit as K.S. on the pool premises, and Villegas corroborated the K.S. claim by saying she was present during the alleged assault.
“T.F. was fired at the pool,” Fishman said.
In a tape-recorded interview with school officials in 2017, the lawsuit alleges K.S. said she made the sexual assault claim against T.F. because “I just don’t like him.”
“I just don’t like to hear him talk. … I don’t like to look at him,” K.S. reportedly disclosed in the recorded interview obtained by Fishman.
On Oct. 2, 2017, K.S. told fellow students “that she would do anything to get T.F. expelled … and accused T.F. of sexual assault” with school officials, the lawsuit states. T.F. was subsequently charged in juvenile court with indecent assault and two counts of harassment.
The Floods eventually agreed in late 2017 to a consent decree where he would not admit guilt but was required to stay out of trouble for six months and report to the county probation department.
In March, another girl — identified as C.S. and a friend of K.S. — reported to a school counselor that the boy had walked into her home uninvited and sexually assaulted her. The allegations were supported by information from two other girls, identified as E.S. and H.R., according to the lawsuit.
On April 9, Zelienople police charged T.F. with indecent assault, criminal trespass and simple assault.
“On April 10, T.F. was removed from class at Seneca Valley High School and placed in leg and wrist shackles by the Jackson Township Police with the assistance of Juvenile Probation Officer Michael Trego,” the lawsuit said.
Trego testified at a hearing that T.F. was a threat to the community, and the teenager had to spend nine days in a juvenile detention center before being released on home-electronic monitoring.
“After 28 days, T.F. was only allowed out of his home to mow his lawn,” the lawsuit contends.
During the case, T.F. was told by school officials he could not play baseball “because every time he was wearing a Seneca Valley jersey, he was representing a school.”
According to the lawsuit, the criminal complaints against the boy began to unravel in May when three of the witnesses admitted they had lied.
On Aug. 30, Goldinger’s office sought an order dismissing all charges against T.F. filed for the March allegation because of the false reports, according to court documents. On Sept. 10, the charges in connection with the 2017 swimming pool incident were ordered closed, according to the lawsuit.
“The Butler County District Attorney’s office promised to file a petition to expunge the record of T.F. in September, but has not yet done so, providing further evidence of gender-based discrimination. The (district attorney) has refused to file criminal charges against K.S., Villegas, C.S., E.S. and H.R. due to gender-based discrimination,” the lawsuit states.
The lawsuit claims school officials have repeatedly refused to mark the academic records of the girls who lied about the assaults.
“T.F. has had psychological trauma because of all this. He’s had to see a psychologist to deal with the physical symptoms which are the direct result of being accused of something when he did not do anything wrong,” Fishman said.
Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, email@example.com or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.
The most effective mentors are people with a wealth of professional experience, those already in leadership positions. More often than not, that means they’re men. “Male mentors are particularly important, as men typically have more power than women in most organizations,” Ragins points out.
There’s just one small problem: all too often, men aren’t comfortable taking female protégés under their wings. That’s the conclusion reached by Sylvia Ann Hewlett, CEO of the Centre for Talent Innovation. “Our research shows that some 64% of senior men avoid solo interactions with junior women because they fear rumours about their motives,” she says.
And that was before the #MeToo revolution. What started out as a hashtash used by actresses to highlight sexual abuse in Hollywood quickly spread, exposing male predators in just about every industry. While many male allies saw the movement as an opportunity to listen and better understand how they could help, some men had a different reaction, instead deciding it was safer to limit contact with their female colleagues. Fears of a backlash that would reverse all progress have quickly spread.
According to this report, The World Economic Forum is an independent international organization committed to improving the state of the world by engaging the foremost political, business and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas—and one of whose major efforts for the past 30 years has been the equalizing of highly trained workers with global companies needing their skills.
With Russian engineering graduates being some of the most sought after due to their rigorous training and fluency in English, this report says, their acceptance rate for internships within the world’s largest engineering firms has remained exceptionally high for the past two decades, and remained undiminished even as unconstrained Russian hysteria turned the United States into a virtual lunatic asylum after the 2016 election of President Donald Trump.
Last year, however, this report notes, Russian engineering universities began reporting that their female graduates were being rejected for internships at American companies at an astronomical rate, but that the same didn’t apply to male graduates—thus prompting The World Economic Forum to begin an investigation, and whose shocking findings discovered that the #MeToo Movement was making US companies terrified to hire women—and whose report titled “#MeToo Is Having Unexpected Consequences For Working Women”, in part, stated:
Researchers have found mentors can help with everything from closing the gender gap in STEM subjects to getting more women into leadership roles.
In fact, for Belle Rose Ragins, a professor at the Lubar School of Business who has been studying workplace diversity for decades, mentoring could be one of the most effective ways of achieving equality at work. “Our research has found that mentoring is one of the main strategies used by women who have made their way to the top,” she explains. “Mentoring relationships are the chisels that help women break through the glass ceiling.”
The most effective mentors are people with a wealth of professional experience, those already in leadership positions. More often than not, that means they’re men. “Male mentors are particularly important, as men typically have more power than women in most organizations,” Ragins points out.
There’s just one small problem: all too often, men aren’t comfortable taking female protégés under their wings. That’s the conclusion reached by Sylvia Ann Hewlett, CEO of the Centre for Talent Innovation. “Our research shows that some 64% of senior men avoid solo interactions with junior women because they fear rumours about their motives,” she says.
And that was before the #MeToo revolution.
What started out as a hashtash used by actresses to highlight sexual abuse in Hollywood quickly spread, exposing male predators in just about every industry.
While many male allies saw the movement as an opportunity to listen and better understand how they could help, some men had a different reaction, instead deciding it was safer to limit contact with their female colleagues.
Fears of a backlash that would reverse all progress have quickly spread.
Fortunately, at least for Judge Kavanaugh, this report notes, Republican Party US Senator Susan Collins rose up against this #MeToo Movement insanity yesterday to proclaim, at least for her, that the standards of “innocence until proven guilty” and fairness still prevail in America, and at the end of her momentous speech on the floor of the US Senate before the entire peoples of America, saw her simply stating: “I Will Vote to Confirm Judge Kavanaugh”.
American Rebels Win “Battle Of Kavanaugh Hill” As Bloodied Democrat Forces Retreat And Regroup At November Plain
7 October 2018
Hello Again Folks,
To say this has been a stressful month for everyone doesn’t even come close to what’s been happening, but I’d like to take a few minutes with you here to explain the context of what’s just happened—that is the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood and assessed.
So, and firstly, let’s go back to the Spring of 1775, in a little thought of to the rest of world British Empire enclave in North America called the American colonies.
The British subjects living in these American colonies at this time had reached their breaking point because their King and government in London weren’t listening to them anymore—even worse were these people continually suffering indignity upon indignity on both themselves and their families by a King and government who couldn’t care less about them, taxed them to the point of poverty, and was preparing to take all of their guns away.
These British subjects had formed themselves into various groups their King and government in London called rebels, and whose various names included “Sons of Liberty” and “Minutemen”.
On the evening of 18 April 1775, over 700 regular army British troops marched out of Boston towards the Massachusetts colony villages of Lexington and Concord to begin the confiscation of guns from the King’s subjects living there—but the peoples of these villages were given advanced warning, formed themselves into their Minutemen militias, and on the morning of 19 April 1775, met these British troops on a bridge where “the shot heard round the world” was fired after a British major yelled, “Throw down your arms! Ye villains, ye rebels!”
As Hillary Clinton was reminded so famously during her 2016 election campaign, the hardscrabble people living in America can take and suffer many indignities at the hands of those who rule over them—BUT DON’T EVER DARE CALL THEM NAMES!!!—as these people will rise up and fight you with everything they’ve got—and that the British soon realized when they surrendered to these American Rebels a few short years later.
On 19 April 1775, the British army learns what happens when you call the American people disparaging names and treat them like dirt
On the morning of 16 September 2018, Democrat Party aligned “Deep State” shadow government forces launched an unprovoked attack on US Federal Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who was President Trump’s nominee to the US Supreme Court—but whose gravest tactical failure, like the British 243 years prior, was calling him a vile name—“rapist”—and that then ignited “The Battle of Kavanaugh Hill”.
First to take the field in “The Battle of Kavanaugh Hill” were the powerful forces of The New York Times and Washington Post, who were then followed by the equally powerful forces of NBC News, CBS News, ABC News, MSNBC News, CNN News, Huffington Post, London’s Guardian, Vox News Service, The Daily Beast (to just name a few), and all the forces Google, Facebook and Twitter could muster, too.
I’ll admit that the “eye-searing” comment the Guardian made about us hurts me a little because of its meanness, but when considering its source, it’s a badge of honor I’ll wear proudly—and the reason is because their knowing, but not telling their readers, that the battle waged against Kavanaugh has an actual name—“Nuts and Sluts”.
First coined by President Bill Clinton political operative James “Ragin’ Cajun” Carville, the term “Nuts and Sluts” is a vile tactic to smear and destroy someone these despicable human beings have targeted—and in this battle was Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s rape accusation that was supposed to create the kind of uproar that would have Kavanaugh withdraw well before any of the dots could be connected by Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley and others.
After uncovering and connecting these “dots” being kept hidden by the mainstream media forces, however, WhatDoesItMean was quickly joined on the field of battle by American patriot rebel sites Townhall.com, ZeroHedge,RumorMillNews, TheGatewayPundit, TheDailyCaller and NaturalNews—to just name a few of the fast dwindling Christian, conservative and libertarian sites under constant attack and censorship still engaged in this epic struggle for the very soul of America against godless enemies.
And, as unbelievable as it really is, our rag tag forces of good, truth and honesty, only being able to survive by the good will of the American patriot rebel forces that support us, won “The Battle of Kavanaugh Hill”, yesterday, against all of the multi-billions-of-dollars backed mainstream media establish enemy forces arrayed against us!
President Donald Trump signs document ascending Judge Brett Kavanaugh to US Supreme Court on 6 October 2018
US Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. administers Constitutional Oath to the Honorable Brett M. Kavanaugh on 6 October 2018
Though “The Battle of Kavanaugh Hill” was, beyond all doubt, a resounding and historic victory for American patriot rebel forces, you must keep in mind that this war is FAR FROM OVER—in fact, and even as I write these words, these “Deep State” aligned Democrat forces are in full retreat to the “November Plain” where the next great battle will take place in just one month’s time—and whose actual meaning is the 2018 Midterm Election occurring in the United Stateson 6 November.
In the days and weeks leading up to “The Battle of the November Plain”, I can assure you with absolute certainty that our demonic enemies are preparing to throw everything they have against us—but I can, also, assure you even more that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal are prepared to meet whatever comes at you with everything they’ve got, too—as will countless other American patriot rebel sites who know the full magnitude of what’s occurring.
Thank you for listening and aiding us in our hour of desperate need, and, as always too, please feel free to write me at firstname.lastname@example.org with any comments/questions/suggestions, and remembering to put ATTN: BRIAN in the subject line.
With this New York Times-NBC News-CIA “license to kill” order against white women reverberating around the globe, this report grimly states, its first target was found yesterday in the rape and murder of white woman journalist Viktoria Marinova—who was labeled as an “Enemy of the Deep State” for her daring to support President Trump and exposing the crimes of his enemies in both the EU and US.
To why the radical “Deep State” leftist forces in the United States have now declared open warfare against white women the world over, this report explains, is due to their stunning defeat in trying to prevent US Federal Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump’s nominee for the US Supreme Court, from being confirmed—but even in whose defeat now sees the anti-TrumpCBS Network having one of their The Late Show With Stephen Colbert writers demonically proclaiming about Kavanaugh with sadistic glee “I’m just glad we ruined his life”.
Terror Strike Kills 20 After Chlorine Gas Bomb Explodes In New York State Limousine
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A seemingly routine new Security Council (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today authorizing the Ministry of Defense (MoD) to deploy chemical weapons experts to work on an investigation being headed by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) takes a shocking and unexpected turn by its noting that this investigative inquiry is solely focused on a mysterious incident occurring in New York State, on 6 October, that killed 20 people said to have died in an accident that barely damaged the limousine they were riding in—and whose owner of, Shahid Hussain, is a long known AQIS al-Qaeda terrorist familiar with how to make and use chlorine gas bombs. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
Barely damaged New York State limousine with no broken windows (above) preposterously claimed to have killed 20 people
(L-R): Sisters Allison King, Abby Jackson, Mary Dyson and Amy Steenburg were among the 20 victims
To the current working hypothesis compiled by the SVR about this mysterious limousine assassination plot that killed 20 Americans, this report concludes, is that in no way whatsoever could these deaths have occurred due to blunt force trauma in the vehicle itself, as the physical damage that would have had to occur in such a vehicle crash would be beyond catastrophic, and would have left it in literal pieces—but whose most likely explanation is that these deaths occurred from a timed chorine gas bomb attached to this vehicles’ ventilation system that would have incapacitated everyone instantly, and left them dead in less than 2 minutes, and that all traces of (except in the victims lungs) would dissipate when this vehicles doors would have been opened by emergency personal—and whose most obvious reason for was to present President Trump with an horrific terrorist attack just weeks before his nation’s critical election that he’d be blamed for—but that couldn’t have been accomplished without the full knowing of “Deep State” elements with the FBI, who are currently battling Trump to the death as more of their vile crimes are being exposed by the day.
Two decades ago, the media weren’t obsessed with Chinese interference in a presidential election.
This summer we mark the 20th anniversary of a major investigation by Congress of attempts by a hostile foreign power to influence an American presidential election.
I’m glad the news media is pursuing the Trump–Russia scandal, but let’s not forget the differences between how they are covering Russia compared with how they reported a similar story — this one involving Communist China — that developed during Bill Clinton’s 1996 reelection campaign. The Washington Post reported in 1998 that “evidence gathered in federal surveillance intercepts has indicated that the Chinese government planned to increase China’s influence in the U.S. political process in 1996.”
Many people still believe that a major cover-up of that scandal worked — in part because the media expressed skepticism and devoted only a fraction of resources they are spending on the Trump–Russia story. Network reporters expressed outright skepticism of the story, with many openly criticizing the late senator Fred Thompson, the chair of the Senate investigating committee, for wasting time and money. On June 17, 1997, Katie Couric, then the Today co-anchor, asked the Washington Post’s Bob Woodward about the story: “Are members of the media, do you think, Bob, too scandal-obsessed, looking for something at every corner?”
According to an analysis by the Media Research Center, the news coverage of the congressional hearings on the China scandal in the summer of 1997 were dwarfed by reports on the murder of fashion designer Gianni Versace and the death of Princess Diana.
The Chinese fundraising scandal involving DNC finance vice chairman John Huang first came to light in the final weeks of the 1996 presidential campaign. A former Commerce Department official, Huang was a top fundraiser who scooped up suspect foreign cash for Team Clinton.
Acid throwing attacks themselves, this report explains, are a form of violent assault defined as the act of throwing acid or a similarly corrosive substance onto the body of another with the intention to disfigure, maim, torture, or kill—and in past modern times was confined to the Indian subcontinent where this criminal practice was most often carried out against women marrying outside of their caste.
Some people have asked about the computer projections for a tremendous increase in civil violence. There is absolutely no resolution to the great divide that has unfolded politically. The Democrats advocate violence as Hillary clearly states. She says that civility can ONLYreturn when the Democrats take back the government. Clearly, this is throwing down the gauntlet that it shall be their way or no way. This is the end of Democracy for what she is saying is there is to be none.
Back at the beginning of the current Private Wave on the Economic Confidence Model in 1985, I warned that we would face a Crisis in Democracy. It would begin as the government loses power over the economy and the people, it first becomes more abusive. We have been gradually witnessing this trend with the hunt for taxes.
The next stage is the violence. This is what will carry us into the peak of 2032. By that time, the hatred we are witnessing today drawn on political lines is simply that what will happen is all civility vanishes and this will build into violence and end in civil war. Unfortunately, this is not my OPINION. It is simply a correlation of trends that repeat throughout history.
Hillary is effectively advocating the destruction of the United States. She has simply stated bluntly that democracy will no longer be tolerated unless the Democrats win and then subjugate the opposition. She just can not see what she is doing.
So welcome to the new reality of where this madness is going. The embattled Supreme Court nominee secured 50 votes in the Senate and was sworn in as Justice Brett Kavanaugh. The Democrats knew that they would lose so they turned the appointment into a dramatic confrontation that was so outrageous at this point NOBODY in their right mind would ever again throw their hat into the ring. This was all staged and it is intended to be taken all the way into 2020. My live sources say the strategy will make Kavanaugh as a poster child and they will label him as a rapist from here on out.
We have crossed the line. There is no going back. We will now face the Decline & Fall of the United States and this is part of the shift of the Financial Capital of the world to China after 2032. When I lived in New Jersey, at the home next door, a bitter divorce took place. The wife refused to agree with anything and even refused to sign their taxes. The house had been on the market and was under contract for $2.6 million. She refuse4d to sign just to spite her husband. The IRS seized the house, put it up for auction, and sold it for $750,000. Her bitterness wiped out her own future. This is what is taking place on a national level.
QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; You have worked with politicians worldwide and both sides. What is your opinion of the politics that has emerged post-Great Depression?
ANSWER: The major difference between the socialism supported by the Democrats/Labour in Western Society is that to them the individual has no value, it is the collective society, which they then elevate themselves to rule. Conservatives believe in the individual has rights and value and that the state is to serve the people. In the eyes of socialism, it is not the individual but the collective society which is the value and they are qualified to rule from above. The socialist always seeks to control others and in so doing, the individual is always sacrificed for the collective state. It is not what your country can do for you personally, it is the teaching that you as the individual are to be sacrificed for the greater good of the whole which is controlled by the politicians – i.e. former the Soviet Union.
Nevertheless, the socialist always pretend that they are on your side. They have flipped everything upside down. Your personal well being is only possible by surrendering your individuality to the state. It is what they have done with Death Insurance. The insurance companies could not sell Death Insurance, so the reversed it and called it Life Insurance. Like fire insurance protects against fire, life insurance does not protect you from living forever. They reversed the label to make you feel proud how much Death Insurance you own. Socialist did the exact same thing. They get people to surrender their individuality to the state and always blame the rich when your quality of life declines.
Keep in mind that career politicians even on the right also support the government against the individual. Thomas Paine in Common Sense took the position. “Some writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections, the latter negatively by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first a patron, the last a punisher.”
This to me is the ultimate struggle. We are talking about our freedom which the Founding Fathers made clear – it was to be We the People, not the people as economic slaves to support the state as the tax burden constantly always rises. The average person pays about 50% of their income to support the government on all levels. When politicians want more, they point to the rich but amazingly taxes always rise for everyone. They have never taxed the rich and lowered taxes for everyone else.
Just look at Venezuela. A country with the highest oil reserves turned left and its people are starving, fleeing the country, and retired people’s pension will buy them perhaps one cup of coffee. Meanwhile. identical to what they found in Russia after the collapse of the government, those in power live lavishly and never starve. The people are outraged by the latest story of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro dining on expensive steak at a “Salt Bae” restaurant in Istanbul during a stop-off returning from a visit to China. Red meat is a rare luxury.
You cannot pursue personal security and happiness when you are subservient to the State. Civilization was not created to make economic slaves out of the people to serve the state. This is why the Founding Father prohibited DIRECT TAXES, which the socialists in the rising era of Marxism embraced at the start of the 20th century. Career Republicans do not support this position either for they have indeed confounded society with themselves and have lost sight of what was the original spirit of freedom.
Once they created the income tax, every individual was now required to account to the state what they possessed and what they did. Since then, all we have are laws that constantly remove our freedoms because they assume we are all hiding money. They constantly lower the definition of the “rich” from $5 million in 1940 to now $250,000 and made it total household income not even individual.
It is now money laundering to keep cash in a safe deposit box for the new interpretation is hiding money from the government is a crime even if you paid your tax. We have Australian boasting “Cash is for Criminals” and they now follow your children to school and interrogate the school how you pay for your children. All of these laws, including confiscating cash when you travel, are all justified because the collective society is more important than the individual.
I am glad I am personally closer to my expiration date for this life than my birth. I feel sorry for my family who I will leave behind because they will NEVER know the freedom that I grew up under. With each passing year, we lose more and more of our human rights and individual security. This can only end in civil war as it has always done throughout history when these two philosophies confront each other. One just wants to be left alone and the other cannot sleep at night if others have what they do not. Their interpretation of “We the People” is the collective state comes before the individual.
Unfortunately, go to the far left and the far right and you end up at the same place for different reasons. We do not seem to just find a middle ground and cling to it. It seems as if history just is compelled to repeat endlessly in bloodshed. Giving 1/10th of our income to support a government is reasonable – 50% is unreasonable. John Stuart Mills in his On Liberty concluded that the only reason government has any right to deprive a citizen of their liberty is to protect another. Today, less than 4% of the people in prison are there for violence. Mueller’s prosecutions are all about taxes.
Well, this one is off the standard blogging path (sort of), although it relates to some images and terms I have seen floating around the 8chan Q posts and so on. I’ve seen “Pepe the Frog”, and really had no idea where this all came from. I’ve also seen the phrase “KEK“, which I found out is an alternative way of writing “lol” (Laughing out Loud). But I never really knew where these things came from, until I was pointed to this article.
This is one story I found absolutely “fascinating”… Perhaps others will feel the same.
“Pepe the Frog is, in fact, the modern-day avatar of an ancient Egyptian deity accidentally resurrected by online imageboard culture. Does that sound like the most b@tsh#t crazy thing you’ve ever heard?
“…sometime around 2010, a sad-looking cartoon frog began to trend among posters on 4chan.org and similar “underground” imageboards. Shortly after, the age-old piece of online vernacular used to express laughter—”LOL”—fell out of favor on these sites. In its place a new slang term of synonymous meaning rose to common use: “KEK.”
“The origins of this trend are much more important. It comes from an odd technicality involving the Korean language and the popular video game World of Warcraft.
“…the 2016 Election… By this time, Pepe the Frog had become the unofficial mascot for 4chan’s political discussion board (a highly despised corner of the Internet fittingly entitled “Politically Incorrect”)… /Pol/ is a place where the unspoken outsiders of Millennial culture gather en masse. Here you’ll find the lonely and depressed, the socially inept, the generational dropouts, and all shades of disenfranchised youth—every one of them united with an unshakable underdog mentality…
“when Donald J. Trump strolled onto the political scene in 2015, it was a match made in heaven. He immediately became /pol/’s candidate of choice. And it wasn’t long before Trump was mated with /pol/’s beloved mascot, in typical imageboard fashion:
“Every post on 4chan and similar venues comes with an 8-digit numerical stamp. This number represents that post’s entry position in the entire posting lineage of the imageboard. With the amount of traffic these sites get, the last couple digits of this number are essentially a random roll. When a poster gets repeated digits, its called “dubs”, “trips”, “quads”, and so on.
“Out of this practice, a strange phenomenon began to take place on /pol/: discussion threads associated with Trump displayed noticeably frequent GETs. [double digits]… Soon, it became all the rage on /pol/ to hail Trump as nothing less than god’s chosen candidate.
“…it turns out Kek is also—and always has been—an ancient Egyptian deity… A frog-headed one… Kuk’s [Kek’s] male form was depicted as a frog, or as a frog-headed man… As a symbol of darkness, Kuk also represented obscurity and the unknown, and thus chaos. Also, Kuk [Kek] was seen as that which occurred before light, thus was known as the bringer-in of light.
“[It] all… came to a head on September 11th, 2016, when three major, mind-blowing events transpired within 48 hours of each other. Three events that would change the face of Kek worship forever:  Hillary Clinton fainted or nearly fainted in New York. The overwhelming sentiment of /Pol/ —still reeling from the event—is captured two days later…  Hillary Clinton literally declares Pepe the Frog an enemy of the state with paper-thin reasoning…  Kek/Pepe’s musical anthem is discovered on YouTube… one or a few anonymous 4chan contributors discovered an old track from the 80’s on YouTube. A track stamped all over with a very familiar face… A B-side vinyl by performer “P. E. P. E.”, sporting a frog with a magic wand.
“Okay, What The Hell Is Going On? Most likely? Chaos Magick. You see, one of the core tenets of Chaos Magick practice (the only mainstay, really) is the creation of magic sigils (also called “glyphs”) to “codify and project one’s Will into the Universe.” Basically, you make an image that represents your “will” (desire fueled by powerful emotions or altered states) and the universe will take care of the rest.”
And so, just like that, two seemingly unrelated elements that would later give life to a deity were arranged in piecemeal fashion. But they remained dormant for several years, up until…
Donald Trump and the 2016 Election
By this time, Pepe the Frog had become the unofficial mascot for 4chan’s political discussion board (a highly despised corner of the Internet fittingly entitled “Politically Incorrect”).
/Pol/ is a place where the unspoken outsiders of Millennial culture gather en masse. Here you’ll find the lonely and depressed, the socially inept, the generational dropouts, and all shades of disenfranchised youth—every one of them united with an unshakable underdog mentality that pervades the forum’s every kilobyte.
To call this place a “white nationalist” or “alt-right” message board is categorically incorrect. /Pol/, above all else, is place where our society’s status quo is mercilessly challenged. It’s a melting pot for well-meaning free thinkers and misguided mad men alike.
It is a place of chaos.
So when Donald J. Trump strolled onto the political scene in 2015, it was a match made in heaven. He immediately became /pol/’s candidate of choice.
And it wasn’t long before Trump was mated with /pol/’s beloved mascot, in typical imageboard fashion:
And then, something very strange began to happen…
The Digits Declare a Deity
One last thing you need to understand about imageboard culture: dubs.
Every post on 4chan and similar venues comes with an 8-digit numerical stamp. This number represents that post’s entry position in the entire posting lineage of the imageboard.
With the amount of traffic these sites get, the last couple digits of this number are essentially a random roll. When a poster gets repeated digits, its called “dubs”, “trips”, “quads”, and so on.
Since a poster can’t know their post number until after they’ve submitted the post, its common for people to “bet” the contents of their message on the occurrence of repeating digits, like so:
When that endeavor proves a successful, a “GET” has been made and the stroke of luck is celebrated.
Out of this practice, a strange phenomenon began to take place on /pol/: discussion threads associated with Trump displayed noticeably frequent GETs.
It wasn’t long before all of these seemingly random elements discussed so far became irreparably tied together within imageboard culture:
Pepe the Frog (now /pol/’s unofficial mascot)
Donald Trump (/pol/’s overwhelming candidate of choice)
Repeating digit post numbers (“GETS”)
“KEK” (used as an expression of delight, particular in response to Trump’s “trolling” of the establishment, as well as in reaction to unlikely GETs in general)
…and a god was born.
Here’s Where It Starts To Get Weird: The Queer Coincidence of Kek
Soon, it became all the rage on /pol/ to hail Trump as nothing less than god’s chosen candidate.
But which god’s chosen candidate exactly?
The answer is obvious: Kek.
Remember how we learned that “kek” the meme came about from an obscure Korean language onomatopoeia, completely independently from Pepe the Frog?
Well, it turns out Kek is also—and always has been—an ancient Egyptian deity…
A frog-headed one.
Quite the coincidence, wouldn’t you say? “A little,” perhaps you reply.
“A little” indeed, but that’s just the very tip of the synchronicity iceberg. That’s just where this unfathomable string of “coincidences” begins. And where it ends? We just don’t know. Day by day this all getting stranger…
Kuk (also spelled as Kek or Keku) is the deification of the primordial concept of darkness in ancient Egyptian religion…
…Like all four dualistic concepts in the Ogdoad, Kuk’s male form was depicted as a frog, or as a frog-headed man, and the female form as a snake, or a snake-headed woman. As a symbol of darkness, Kuk also represented obscurity and the unknown, and thus chaos. Also, Kuk was seen as that which occurred before light, thus was known as the bringer-in of light.
And who else, at this point, had been declared a “bringer of light” into the world by enthusiastic supporters (mainstream and imageboard alike)?
It gets even weirder.
The pot really started to boil when this bizarre misprint statuette was dug up from a mysterious vendor called “Ancient Treasures” on Amazon. For years the product had been coincidentally mislabeled a “KEK” statue, despite actually bearing the hieroglyphics for the frog goddess HEQET.
And ya know, the thing about this ONE unique arrangement of hieroglyphics…they bear an undeniable resemblance to a certain special something:
Do you see it?
A person sitting down. In front of a computer.
Like say, to post on an imageboard?
And what’s that on the other side of the computer?
With this “holy talisman’s” discovery, The Cult of Kek suddenly took on a concrete form. This new digital “faith” is summed up neatly in this image passed around on all the major imageboards of the day:
It Gets Weirder: Pepe/Keke “Emerges” in Plain Sight on September 11th, 2016
Soon, /pol/’s users were—quite ironically, at first—attributing all strokes of luck for the Trump campaign (and likewise, all strokes of misfortune for the Hillary campaign) to their benevolent frog-headed deity that spoke to them in dubs.
But all of that came to a head on September 11th, 2016, when three major, mind-blowing events transpired within 48 hours of each other. Three events that would change the face of Kek worship forever:
Here’s the short version: Pepe is a cartoon frog who began his internet life as an innocent meme enjoyed by teenagers and pop stars alike.
But in recent months, Pepe’s been almost entirely co-opted by the white supremacists who call themselves the “alt-right.” They’ve decided to take back Pepe by adding swastikas and other symbols of anti-semitism and white supremacy.
What can I or anyone else hope to add here? How bizarre does reality get? How deep does the rabbit hole go?
Oh, I see how deep…
(REALLY F#CKI’N WEIRD)Kek/Pepe’s musical anthem is discovered on YouTube:
Now get a load of this one.
While all of this was happening, one or a few anonymous 4chan contributors discovered an old track from the 80’s on YouTube. A track stamped all over with a very familiar face:
That’s right folks. A B-side vinyl by performer “P. E. P. E.”, sporting a frog with a magic wand.
And what’s P. E. P. E. stand for?
“Probably.” What are sweet repeating digit GETs all about? Probability.
What is this “gist” of Kekism on /pol/? He speaks to them through dubs. Their ancient egyptian god of obscurity and chaos “emerges/enters” at “points” of “probability.”
Feel like that’s a stretch? Check out what the full-length vocal version’s album artwork is adorned with:
Don’t see the significance? Let 4chan help you:
(Again, note the post’s number)
And—hey—who’s that fair-haired man pointed towards Trump Tower’s clock in the artwork?
You see, one of the core tenets of Chaos Magick practice (the only mainstay, really) is the creation of magic sigils (also called “glyphs”) to “codify and project one’s Will into the Universe.”
Basically, you make an image that represents your “will” (desire fueled by powerful emotions or altered states) and the universe will take care of the rest.
When a lot of people pool their united willpower towards a single sigil, its called a Hypersigil, and its exponentially more potent.
Pepe/Kek is 4chan’s hypersigil.
Millions of the “little people” that browse 4chan have embedded the image of Pepe with their hatred for Hillary’s alleged corruption, and their hope for Trump’s victory over her in November. Whether they did this consciously or not, its exactly what has happened.
And so far, their hypersigil seems to be working.
Hold Up: You’re Seriously Telling Me Magic Is Real?
Absolutely I am. But you must understand, “magic” probably isn’t what you think it is. It’s not about wand-waving or pentagrams or sacrificing babies.
Magick is actually much less involved than that. As a matter of fact, you’re casting magick right now. You pretty much always are, whether you like it or not.
That’s because the REAL magic comes from plain and simple human attention. How you look at reality shapes it in ways that we’re only now beginning to fully understand. Ironically, the science of quantum physics is rapidly bringing the reality of magick to light (shadilay).
Cancer cells possess different electrical and chemical properties than normal cells.
In cancerous tissue the electrical potential of cell membranes is maintained at a lower level than that of healthy cells. Dr. Jerry Tennant says that at +30 millivolts we get cancer, a level of voltage where the polarity has shifted from negative to positive.
Dr. Merrill Garnett reports that all cancer cells have abnormal electron transfer systems and that normal cell development involves normal energy flows.
Dr. Steve Haltiwanger says,
“What is known is that in cancer changes in cell membrane structure, changes in membrane function, changes in cell concentrations of minerals, changes in cell membrane potential, changes in the electrical connections within the cells and between cells, and changes in cellular energy production all occur.”
Heavy metals and chemical toxins are capable of causing cancerous transformations because they affect the structure and function of the cell membrane and the mitochondria – disrupting the electrical potential of cell membranes and the structure of mitochondrial membranes, which ends up deactivating the electron transport chain and disturbing oxygen-dependent energy production.
Cells will then revert to fermentation, which is a less efficient primeval form of energy production.
The German cancer researcher Dr. Paul Gerhard Seeger found that cancer cells utilize only between 5 and 50% of the oxygen of normal cells. The virulence of cancer cells is directly proportional to their loss of oxygen utilization, and with this to the degree of blockage of the respiratory chain.
In 1957 Seeger successfully transformed normal cells into cancer cells within a few days by introducing chemicals that blocked the respiratory chain.
Seeger demonstrated in 1938 that in most cases cancer starts in the cytoplasm, the jelly-like outer part of the cell, and especially in the energy-producing mitochondria. Here food fragments are normally oxidized in a series of enzymatic steps called the ‘respiratory chain’.
This is very inefficient and the resulting overproduction of lactic acid makes the cell and the whole body overly acidic.
Cancer tumors not only have a low voltage but they go beyond that into a range that it is so low that they are stealing electrons from the surrounding tissues thus lowering their voltage-pulling them down into cancer as well.
A plus sign in front of the voltage number means that they have crossed a threshold, they have reversed polarity and have thus become the enemies of the healthy cells of the body. When our voltage goes down too far (even when still on the healthy negative side) we start to experience pain and sickness.
A reading of -15, -10, or even -5 can be experienced (as increasing pain) but it is not until they go down below zero and beyond to a +30, that cancer occurs.
A plus sign means they are stealing, hungry for electrons whereas a negative sign (normal) means cells have energy and electrons to give. The negative sign of the membrane potential indicates that the inside surface of the cell membrane is relatively more negative than the than the immediate exterior surface of the cell membrane. (1)
According to Seeger cancer cells become more electronegative as their membrane degenerate.
In the initial phase of carcinogenesis, the external cell membrane weakens and then the inner mitochondrial membrane, which alters the energy producing capacity forcing the cell into fermentation as an alternative source of energy.
The degenerative changes in the inner membrane of the mitochondria causes loss of anchorage of critical mitochondrial enzymes. The mitochondria in cancer cells degenerate and die off in large numbers.
When we add voltage to cells we improve cell membrane potentials and increase mitochondrial production of ATP, cell membrane permeability, production of proteins and as well as increase absorption of nutrients and elimination of cellular wastes.
pH, Voltage and Oxygen
Voltage circuits run through the nervous system and heart.
Body fluids, vessels, fascia and other connective tissues conduct electrical energy. When we have enough voltage, enough energy our body transports oxygen efficiently. All cells need a steady supply of oxygen to power their mitochondria, where more electrons are generated.
We can raise voltage in the body by directly imputing electrons to facilitate oxygen delivery, which of course raises energy levels and the health of all cells.
Research scientists from the Cancer Research UK-MRC Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology & Biology at the University of Oxford have discovered that oxygen makes cancer cells weak and less resistant to treatment.
Previously scientists have tried to cut off the blood (thus oxygen) thought to be fueling tumor growth.
The idea has been to starve and kill the tumor. When we use oxygen as a treatment it actually improves the blood vessels within the tumors thus increasing the concentration of oxygen present.
“The degree to which pH is depressed in tumors – as mirrored by their lactate levels – tends to correlate with prognosis, the more acidic tumors being associated with poorer outcome.
In part, this phenomenon may reflect the fact that tumor acidity is serving as a marker for HIF-1 activation, which works in a variety of complementary ways to boost tumor capacity for invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis, and chemo-resistance.
However, there is increasing evidence that extracellular acidityper se contributes to the aggressiveness of cancer cells, boosting extracellular proteolytic activities, expression of pro-angiogenic factors, and metastatic capacity.”
The link between voltage and cancer goes back to the late 1930s, when Dr. Harold Saxton Burr used a new-fangled device called a voltmeter to show that tumor tissue has different electrical properties from normal tissue.
In the early 1970s Dr. Clarence Cone, a biophysicist at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Virginia, traced this difference to a disparity in cell polarization, or how much more negatively charged the inside of a cell is compared with its outside.
Tumor cells, Cone found, are less polarized than normal cells, and he suggested that electric polarization might somehow be a regulator of cancer and other cell proliferation.
Tumorous cells (highlighted in red) have consistently lower voltages than healthy cells.
Dr. Michael Levin at Tufts University in Medford, MA, and doctoral student Brook Chernet have in recent years found persuasive evidence that Cone was right.
In their experiment, they injected messenger RNA that encodes human oncogenes – genes that can transform normal cells into tumor cells – into tadpoles. Next, they soaked the frog larvae in fluorescent dye.
This dye was voltage-sensitive, fluorescing more brightly when the cell polarization was greater.
Levin and Chernet did not know which tadpoles would develop tumors. However, as soon as a tadpole exhibited a dark patch of low fluorescence, indicating lowered cell polarization, the researchers segregated it from the others to monitor it.
They found that, over several days, such patches of lowered polarization nearly always developed into tumors, confirming the link between cell polarization and cancer.
Stop Cancer by Increasing Polarization of the Cells
Dr. Jerry Tennant says,
“We do not treat cancer. We do support patients with cancer to help get their nutrition, minerals, acid-base balance, etc. in as good a condition as possible.”
He also says,
“The reversal of polarity occurs in a battery in a circuit and the accompanying loss of oxygen with low voltage tells local stem cells to make a placenta (cancer) to attempt to correct the low voltage and oxygen via fermentation since there is inadequate oxygen to keep that organ functional.
The on switch for cancer is an accumulation of electron stealers in an acupuncture circuit; the off switch for cancer is removing the causes of low voltage and inserting enough electrons to reverse the polarity back to normal.”
According to researchers at Tufts University, the two phenomena – lowered polarization and tumor development – are connected by a straightforward chain of events.
Cells become polarized when there is an imbalance of the positive and negative ions that flow in and out of cells through channels in cell membranes.
Polarization itself regulates the operation of so-called transporter proteins, which pump signaling molecules through the channels.
Through their experiments, Levin and Chernet have found that a lowered polarization inhibits the function of a transporter protein that draws in the signaling molecule butyrate, which, through various enzymes, controls the expression of growth genes.
With less butyrate in the cell, these genes are free to instigate abnormally high, cancerous growth.
Levin is encouraging scientists to consider the possibility that tumor cells are not irrevocably damaged, at least not all of them, and other researchers have suggested the same.
Dr. Johanna Budwig‘s emphasis on ingesting quality lipids gives cell membranes the potential to heal and increase their voltage.
Surviving cancer is never going to be completely easy but is possible as long as one does all the right things.
The right things brought together into a meaningful protocol will yield the results we might expect from anything that declares itself to be a cure. It is foolish to declare any one substance or approach a cure when we can combine many powerful things starting with treating cancer with electrons – with pure energy.
The obvious way to stop cancer growth is to increase the polarization of the cells by adding voltage, alkalinity and oxygen.
The point is that we are talking in the most basic language of biological existence – of an axis of agents:
cell voltage (electrons as medicine)
pH (any agent that is alkalizing as medicine)
oxygen as medicine (which is needed for efficient metabolism)
Treating cancer with the triad of voltage, alkalinity and oxygen is an interesting new approach because it treats the fundamental reasons cancer cells form and get aggressive.
What is most interesting is that voltage, alkalinity and oxygen levels track each other. They all increase or decrease together yet we can use treatment approaches that focus on each of the triads arms.
The most important factor in creating proper pH is increasing oxygen because no wastes or toxins can leave the body without first combining with oxygen. The more alkaline you are, the more oxygen your fluids can hold and keep.
Oxygen also buffers/oxidizes metabolic waste acids helping to keep you more alkaline.
Of course, when we increase oxygen and pH levels we are simultaneously increasing cellular voltage.
“The Secret of Life is both to feed and nourish the cells and let them flush their waste and toxins”, according to Dr. Alexis Carrell, Nobel Prize recipient in 1912.
Dr. Otto Warburg, also a Nobel Prize recipient, in 1931 and 1944, said,
“If our internal environment was changed from an acidic oxygen deprived environment to an alkaline environment full of oxygen, viruses, bacteria and fungus cannot live.”
Oxygen Disassociation Curve
The position of the oxygen disassociation curve (ODC) is influenced directly by pH, core body temperature and carbon dioxide pressure.
According to Warburg, it is the increased amounts of carcinogens, toxicity and pollution that cause cells to be unable to uptake oxygen efficiently. This is connected with over-acidity, which itself is created principally under low oxygen conditions.
“The strength with which oxygen binds to hemoglobin is affected by several factors. These factors shift or reshape the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve.
A rightward shift indicates that the hemoglobin under study has a decreased affinity for oxygen.
This makes it more difficult for hemoglobin to bind to oxygen (requiring a higher partial pressure of oxygen to achieve the same oxygen saturation), but it makes it easier for the hemoglobin to release oxygen bound to it.
The effect of this rightward shift of the curve increases the partial pressure of oxygen in the tissues when it is most needed, such as during exercise, or hemorrhagic shock.
In contrast, the curve is shifted to the left by the opposite of these conditions.
This leftward shift indicates that the hemoglobin under study has an increased affinity for oxygen so that hemoglobin binds oxygen more easily, but unloads it more reluctantly.
Left shift of the curve is a sign of hemoglobin’s increased affinity for oxygen (e.g. at the lungs).
Similarly, right shift shows decreased affinity, as would appear with an increase in either body temperature, hydrogen ions, 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate (formerly named diphosphoglycerate, which is now considered incorrect) or carbon dioxide concentration.”
According to Annelie Pompe, a prominent mountaineer and world-champion free diver, alkaline tissues can hold up to 20 times more oxygen than acidic ones.
When our body cells and tissues are acidic (below pH of 6.5-7.0), they lose their ability to exchange oxygen. Increases of carbon dioxide, bicarbonates and electrons lead to increased oxygen.
Tumor cell differentiation, tumor hypoxia and low cellular pH and voltage affects gene expression, genetic stability, genetic repair, protein structures, protein activity, intracellular mineral concentrations, and types of metabolic pathways used for energy production.
There is no shortage of research showing the link between pH and cancer, which translates clearly into there is plenty of research showing a link between cancer and low voltage since voltage and pH are measurements of the same thing.
Cancer thrives in an acidic low voltage low oxygen environment, and doesn’t survive in a normal, more alkaline (high voltage) environment.
Cancer cells make your body more acidic as they produce lactic acid.
The severity of hypoxia and acidosis in tumors can affect tumor cell invasiveness, metastasis as well as the risk of recurrence.
UT Southwestern scientists led by Dr. Ralph Mason reported in the online issue of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine that countering hypoxic and aggressive tumors with an “oxygen challenge” – inhaling oxygen while monitoring tumor response – coincides with a greater delay in tumor growth in an irradiated animal model. (1)
Scientists at the University of Colorado Cancer Center said,
“It seems as if a tumor deprived of oxygen would shrink.
However, numerous studies have shown that tumor hypoxia, in which portions of the tumor have significantly low oxygen concentrations, is in fact linked with more aggressive tumor behavior and poorer prognosis.
A team of researchers lead by Dr. Bradly Wouters, at the University of Toronto, Canada assert that tumors with large areas with low levels of oxygen (areas known as hypoxic regions) are associated with poor prognosis and treatment response.(3)
Not all the regions of a tumor are equal in terms of their oxygen levels. One clinically important implication of this is that tumors with large areas with low levels of oxygen (areas known as hypoxic regions) are associated with poor prognosis and treatment response.
Dr. Paolo Michieli and colleagues, at the University of Turin Medical School, Italy found that tumors rely on hypoxia to promote their own expansion. Hypoxia is a key factor driving tumor progression.
This is a hallmark of malignant tumors and has been suggested to promote tumor progression.(4)
…we have a cancer approach that is worth consideration.
Using voltage testing and voltage for treatment is a relatively new way of dealing with cancer.
“There’s been a little bit of disbelief, because it’s a whole different ball game,” says Dr. Mustafa Djamgoz, a cancer biologist at Imperial College in London.
“It has opened up a whole new set of opportunities.”
Oncologists know that having a strong immune system is important in fighting cancer.
“The immune system needs voltage, iodine and ozone to kill bugs. Tumors cannot grow if the oxygen levels are normal, and oxygen levels are controlled by voltage,” says Dr. Jerry Tennant.
He could have said oxygen levels are controlled by pH or oxygen levels control voltage because if there is too little oxygen then the mitochondria cannot create enough ATP to keep cellular energy high.
Do Not Forget the Body Temperature
It is important to notice in the above chart about the oxygen disassociation curve that temperature is important.
Dr. Aleksandr Samuilovich Presman in his 1970 book Electromagnetic Fields and Life identified several significant effects of the interaction of electromagnetic fields with living organisms.
have information and communication roles in that they are employed by living organisms as information conveyors from the environment to the organism, within the organism and among organisms
are involved in life’s vital processes in that they facilitate pattern formation, organization and growth control within the organism
Dr. Haltiwanger says,
“Normal cells possess the ability to communicate information inside themselves and between other cells.
The coordination of information by the cells of the body is involved in the regulation and integration of cellular functions and cell growth. It takes energy to communicate it takes voltage. When cancer arises cancer cells are no longer regulated by the normal control mechanisms.
Communication breaks down because there is not enough voltage for anything but destruction.”
All biological process and in particular the metabolism of every single cell are based on their voltage and electromagnetic frequency.
Only an organism which is sufficiently supplied with energy is able to control the self-regulating mechanisms and has the powers of regeneration and healing.
“Deprive a cell of 35% of its oxygen for 48 hours and it may become cancerous,” said Dr. Otto Warburg.
Deprived of air we die, but our cells have a bastardly trick up their sleeves where they can survive low-oxygen conditions.
We call this condition cancer, the slow starvation of healthy cells while cancer cells thrive.
Cancer involves an interaction between rogue cells and surrounding tissue. This is the clear message of Dr. Mina Bissell.
Cancer cells routinely form in most people’s bodies in areas of low voltage, low oxygen and acidic pH. What this means is that the health or sickness of surrounding cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix interact to shape cancer cell behaviors such as polarity, migration and proliferation.
In the New York Times, we see Dr. Susan Love, a breast cancer surgeon saying,
“What it means, if all this environmental stuff is right, is that we should be able to reverse cancer without having to kill cells. This could open up a whole new way of thinking about cancer that would be much less assaultive.”
Cancer geneticist Dr. Bert Vogelstein, director of the Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics at John Hopkins said,
“One cannot fully understand that disease unless one understands the tumor’s environment.”
Though not the only way, micro-current is the easiest and most direct way of altering local environments that surround cancer tumors.
Electrocution of Cancer Cells
Some medical scientists discovered that zapping cells with extremely brief, high-voltage electric pulses that they could trigger the self-destruct mechanism in the cells’ biochemical machinery.
In the 1950’s, a Swedish radiologist and surgeon, Dr. Björn Nordenström demonstrated that when micro-current was passed through needles implanted into cancerous tumors it blocked cancer pain and in many cases caused the tumors to regress or disappear.
He theorized that this treatment set up a form of electro-osmosis that dehydrated the tumor and blocked production of pain-producing substances such as histamine.
Dr Haltiwanger said that Nordenström’s technique was to place the positive electrode into the tumor and the negative electrode outside of the tumor.
“This resulted in an increased flow of electrons into the tumor, a change in the electrical field around a tumor and activation of membrane receptors and ion channels.
If tumor cells are in fact electron deficient this increased flow of electrons, membrane receptor effects and movement of ions through ion channels will have definite effects on cellular metabolic processes.”
Using needle electrodes, they zapped tumors with a series of electric pulses 300 nanoseconds long and 60 kilovolts per centimeter in magnitude. They found that treated tumors grew only 50 to 60 percent as big as the untreated tumor, with many cells dying by apoptosis.
Delivering such high voltage in just a few billionths of a second is akin to accelerating a car from 0 to 100 kilometers per hour and then decelerating it back to 0, all within 1 second.
low-frequency pulses create a brief, intense voltage around each cell. The mitochondria within the cell grab some of this energy. This, in turn, makes the cell more efficient at producing ATP and delivering oxygen throughout the body.
Using micro-current is a more direct way of bathing cells with voltage boosting ATP production even higher than PEMFT techniques though the two can and should be used together.
The spread or metastases of cancer is inversely proportional to the amount of oxygen and the acidity around the cancer cells.
The more oxygen, the slower the cancer spreads. The less oxygen and the higher the acidity the faster the cancer spreads. If cancer cells get enough oxygen, they will die (cancer cells are anaerobic).
If you deprive a group of cells of vital oxygen (their primary source of energy), some will die, but others will manage to alter their genetic software program and mutate and be able to live without oxygen.
When the oxygen level drops below 60%, the respiration process of making energy changes into fermentation in a cancer cell. Normal cells turn cancerous. Normal body cells need oxygen and are aerobic whereas cancer cells do not need oxygen and are anaerobic.
Healthy cells metabolize, burn oxygen and glucose to produce ATP.
Bottom line, orthodox cancer treatments DO NOT treat cancer for they not only do not address oxygen, pH and voltage levels, they make the situation worse by lowering oxygen levels further, turn the body more acid and thus health and voltage levels suffer.
What else should one expect from toxic chemicals found in chemotherapy and highly toxic nuclear radiation that is also used in orthodox cancer treatments and tests.
Sometimes these dangerous treatments do kill cancer before it kills the host.
No matter what anyone says cancer survival statistics still imply that present orthodox cancer treatments are not doing the job they should be doing, which is to from the first moment of diagnosis, to raise body oxygen levels along with pH levels as well as increase overall body voltage through a host of means.